Search Results
83 results found for ""
- Why Must We Organize the South?
“As the South goes, so goes the nation.”—W.E.B. DuBois “One thing we do not need is more labor unions. We have gotten where we are without them, and we do not need them now.”— Henry McMaster, Governor of South Carolina, State of the State address, January 2024 So where exactly have we gotten? Currently, workers in the Southern U.S. have the lowest wages in the country leading to the highest poverty levels; we have the weakest worker protections and badly underfunded public services leading to the worst health outcomes and the shortest life spans; and fewer than 5% of workers have collective bargaining. One must ask, is this their goal for the rest of the country too? How will the South be organized? The short answer: in the same way that all U.S. working class movements have succeeded. The Southern Workers Assembly was created in 2012 to encourage Southern workers to exercise some degree of power over their work lives and their living situation regardless of their union status. Black Americans account for 20% of the population in the Southern states and more than half of all African Americans in the US live in the south. Black men in particular have the highest rate of unionization among all workers in the US. African American workers have a history of leading successful social movements and, given the historical role of slavery and white supremacy in shaping the Southern economy, labor struggles by Black workers are inherently political struggles for self-determination and against the whole system of racist exploitation. Therefore, the SWA centers our organizing work on recognizing, promoting, and following Black workers and workers of color, all the while seeking to build solidarity across lines of race, gender, and other social categories. Of course, all workers need collective bargaining, but waiting for lightning to strike and spontaneously light the fire for unionism is not a viable strategy. And neither is relying on the occasional NLRB election for three reasons. Reason One — The Numbers Don’t Add Up The labor movement can’t possibly run enough elections fast enough to make a difference. In the U.S. there are roughly 160 million workers, of which about 135 million are covered by the National Labor Relations Act. Twelve million are already in unions. That leaves about 120 million private sector workers eligible for NLRB elections. While 2024 polling showed that nearly 60 million workers would join a union if they could, only 120,000 workers participated in recognition elections, which turned out to be double the number of 60,000 in 2021. At this rate, in 100 years we will have organized only 10% of the non-union workers. Reason Two — Massive Organizing Happens in Sweeps Not One-at-a-Time During the period 1930 to 1941, social turmoil resulted in mass working class organization and collective bargaining in major U.S. industries. SWA identified the necessary elements that were present in the upsurge and uses those lessons to guide our efforts. The first and most important element is the existence of a committed core of experienced activists and organizers in major workplaces linked together in networks that spread throughout both industrial sectors and geographies. Their common intent was to establish collective bargaining as a democratic necessity and thereby win a better life for the entire working class. Many failures taught them through their practical experience to use sympathy strikes, defy injunctions and use brief sit down strikes to win grievances. Other elements – including sharply defined class politics, new legislation encouraging collective bargaining, a few top union leaders who broke politically and tactically with the moribund AFL by refusing to compromise militancy and gave local organizing efforts a national voice and support— were necessary but not sufficient for success. Without the organized pre-existing network of experienced cadre, ready to act once the breakthrough occurred, in this case the Flint sit-down strike victory, massive organizing involving millions would not have spread. Reason Three — Successful Collective Bargaining Requires Significant Power The objective of collective bargaining and striking is to have and exert sufficient power to establish wages and conditions that materially advance the lives of millions. It is inconceivable that bargaining based on one or two workplaces within a non-union sector or corporation or region could result in meaningful collective bargaining. In today’s world, dependent as we are on the NLRB certification to bargain contracts, we must have a strategy that starts with building organization within the shops and workplaces led by a network of cadre, trained worker leaders and organizers, in many important industries and sectors. These shop floor or workplace organizations may start as organizing committees with an eye toward conducting multiple NLRB elections and thus bringing to bear sufficient power to negotiate contracts in a coordinated way. Or they may build union organizations that take up struggles and campaigns on the shop floor, winning rights and victories that work toward building power sufficient to demand recognition and collective bargaining. Recent Examples: Recent examples of unions successfully winning union elections in multiple locations in the same employer and using a coordinated strategy in bargaining include the Starbucks Workers United campaign of hundreds of coffee shops and the National Nurses Organizing Committee efforts from 2004 to 2010 to organize nurses in the Southern states. Non-union nurses built a network across many hospitals and in several states resulting in dozens of facilities in two for-profit hospital chains winning elections and union contracts. The work in both campaigns continues but it doesn’t appear that workers in either campaign intended that one shop would take on these corporate behemoths by themselves. Another version of this strategy is the Black Workers for Justice campaigns in the 1980s and 90s to build functioning non-majority unions in multiple locations in the private sector prior to attempting to conduct elections or by establishing meet and confer in the public sector, as public sector unions proliferated in the last several decades. The method was to build rank and file committees and make workplace demands which were won with collective actions in the workplace. In the non-union South, BWFJ organizers used these methods to build the North Carolina Public Service Workers Union, UE Local 150, where collective bargaining is prohibited by law in the public sector. Several of these committees and UE Local 150 exist to this day and provide leadership to workers in developing local assemblies in SWA. Southern Workers Assembly Strategy SWA learned from our working-class history and developed a strategy that applies to today’s conditions. We created an intentional and deliberate plan of organization and cadre development in multiple workplaces in discrete geographies to lay the groundwork for a “sweep” of workers forming unions. This not only gets us to scale in terms of the numbers needed to really grow the labor movement but also to exert significant power in negotiations that result from multiple elections. We think that a committee of three to five workers in a shop is sufficient to start. Our method is to establish leafleting brigades of local activists and political allies to reach out to workers at their shift change. Lately we have been using social media as a method of outreach as well. Once there are committees in three to five workplaces, an assembly can be established to engage in collective action — mostly public facing campaigns designed to address workplace issues and develop leaders. Currently, we have a network of 17 local assemblies in four states and are always working on developing more. Once we had a few assemblies, we started to conduct worker schools usually twice a year to meet together, build community and network, develop skills, and strategize campaigns. The worker schools were another featured methodology developed by Black Workers for Justice in its 40 year history of organizing. Several years ago SWA started to create industrial councils in manufacturing, education, hospitality, logistics, and tourism. Our newest council is being established for gig drivers. We developed a ten-point Southern Worker Power Program creating some cohesion among the demands that assemblies and councils could fight for. The program is based on the idea that as workers we have certain rights and therefore we make demands that enforce and enhance those rights. Pieces of the program include demands related to health care, collective bargaining rights, education, ending all forms of discrimination and providing reparations for Black and Indigenous people, demilitarizing the police and ending unpaid prison labor, and a clean environment and taking steps to counteract the effects of climate change. Experience and activism will inform the local assemblies, workplace organizations, and cadre about which of these issues to take on as well as which strategies and tactics will work; sit downs are not likely to be the preferred strategy but other ideas will occur to people. Efforts will fail and workers will learn, new tactics will be devised. SWA attempts to replicate the elements that we have some control over while paying attention to when other conditions become present for a breakthrough. When that happens, the organizations and cadre that are working in the many non-union workplaces and industries will be looking for it, they will recognize it for what it is, and they will cause a “sweep” into the unions. SWA’s Newest Project: Electric Vehicle Rank and File Project About 15% of carbon emissions in the U.S. come from cars. It is even higher when you calculate in trucks and other forms of transportation. It is important for the climate that people start to drive electric vehicles instead of relying on combustion engines. It is equally important that the workers don’t lose good quality jobs during that transition to a cleaner environment. Recently, SWA embarked on a new project that is very intentional about developing cadre in the new Electric Vehicle industry and associated manufacturing plants. We have done broad outreach to workers intending to go to work in this new industry and network them together so they can have a coordinated approach to organizing in their workplaces. We identified five cities where we would start based on certain criteria. We want cities that have new construction as well as a cluster of other manufacturing plants and would therefore be hiring lots of people. We think that makes it easier for people to get hired and also, with an entirely new workforce, nobody is disadvantaged in terms of exerting leadership with their co-workers. We also want locations where SWA has a local assembly so that these workers can be networked together both by industry and geography. We have gotten a good start on this work. One day this industry and the South will be unionized. Looking back at the lessons learned from the creation of the CIO and the elements necessary for success, we can’t control for several of them. But we can influence the most important of the elements. We can build organization, develop cadres of leadership in important industries and we can create networks of these shop floor organizations and leaders and the militant minorities in their workplaces. We can take collective action and learn what tactics are effective and which to avoid. We can pay attention to the objective conditions and when conditions exist to have a major sweep of workers into unions, there will be dozens of geographic areas and several electric vehicle locations ready to be part of that. This essay appears courtesy of International Publishers in New York . This paper will be published in 2025 in the collection “Square Up: Building Labor’s Power in the Second Gilded Age” by Lorri Nandrea and Tony Pecinovsky. This essay was republished from Southern Workers Assembly .
- “Free Mahmoud Khalil Now”: Raleigh Protest Calls for Activist’s Release
On March 15, approximately 75 demonstrators gathered in Moore Square to protest the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, an anti-war activist from Columbia University. The event featured speakers from UNC Students for Justice in Palestine, the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), Jewish Voices for Peace, and other groups. Key topics included threats to freedom of speech, continued Israeli attacks on Gaza, and unexpected support for Khalil among North Carolina's Democratic congresspeople. No elected officials attended the demonstration, which was more heavily surveilled by Raleigh police than previous pro-Palestine rallies. The rally began with chants such as, “Palestine is not for sale, Donald Trump belongs in jail!” before Hashem Amireh was introduced as the first speaker. Amireh, president of the UNC graduate student union, was suspended in May 2024 for Palestine activism [ 1 ]. “We do what we do for the sake of the oppressed,” said Amireh, “For the sake of Palestinians who have endured almost eighty years of dispossession, violence, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide.” Amireh, who relies on a student visa, noted that he enjoys fewer legal protection than Khalil, a green card holder. He vowed to continue his anti-war activism despite the increased risk of deportation. As Amireh spoke, audience members held signs with slogans like “Jews say, free Mahmoud” and “Fight Nazis, not students.” The Trump administration is seeking to deport Mahmoud Khalil using the Immigration and National Act of 1952, which allows the expulsion of non-citizens for almost any reason. Khalil’s deportation could be halted if the judicial branch finds the 1952 law unconstitutional under the First or Fifth Amendments. The Immigration and National Act was passed during the Second Red Scare, an anticommunist hysteria used to undermine various forms of domestic dissent. Forward magazine reports that Democratic Senator Pat McCarran introduced the law in part to keep out “Jewish Holocaust survivors suspected of being Soviet agents” [ 2 ]. The second speaker, Rania Masri of the North Carolina Green Party, discussed recent Israeli attacks on Gaza. She said, “In the past 24 hours alone, twelve Palestinians in Gaza were slaughtered, butchered, shredded by US-made weaponry dropped by the Israeli pilots. That was including four children. Nine people were killed this morning in Beit Lahiya in northern Gaza while they were trying to distribute aid." According to NPR , eight of Israel's victims in the Beit Lahiya bombing were staff members of the UK-based Al-Khair Foundation, a humanitarian aid organization [ 3 ]. During her remarks, Masri defended her decision to vote for the Green Party in the 2024 presidential election, and also praised people who voted for PSL. Green Party nominee Dr. Jill Stein received 0.4 percent of the vote in North Carolina, while PSL’s Claudia Cruz garnered about 0.01 percent. Vice President Kamala Harris lost the state by 3.2 percent. A speaker for the Palestinian Youth Movement linked recent Israeli attacks on Gaza and the West Bank to Khalil’s arrest: “These struggles are not far from us and the arrest Mahmoud Khalil is a prime example of that. As we all know now, undercover ICE agents kidnapped Mahmoud and claimed they were acting on State Department orders to revoke his student visa. When he explained to them that he had a green card, they claimed they would revoke that instead.” Dozens of peace rallies have been held in Moore Square since October 2023. Speeches in the park are often followed by police-escorted marches. However, law enforcement presence seemed heavier at Saturday's event, with multiple officers patrolling the square and motorcycle cops stationed at nearby intersections. Raleigh city government and police have never moved to repress the ceasefire rallies, which have been able to maintain a safe, family-friendly atmosphere. Sandra Korn of Jewish Voice for Peace addressed the crowd. She said, “What we saw in the last couple of weeks was a state-sponsored kidnapping targeting multiple students who spoke out for Palestinian human rights. All people of conscience, including Jewish people, should be demanding Mahmoud Khalil’s release immediately.” Korn shared the news that North Carolina congresspeople Valerie Foushee and Deborah Ross had just signed a letter strongly criticizing Khalil’s detention [ 4 ]. The crowd cheered, pleasantly surprised at the move by two pro-Israel lawmakers. AIPAC spent around $2 million to help elect Foushee in 2022. In May 2024, Foushee and other lawmakers travelled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in May 2024 to discuss plans for continued wars against Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iran [ 5 ]. Netanyahu now faces an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes, including starvation and attacks on civilians. Ross has accepted over $20,000 from AIPAC since 2020 and staunchly refused to support a ceasefire throughout the US-Israeli assault on Gaza. In May 2024, she voted in favor of HR 6090, a bill aimed at suppressing criticism of Israel on college campuses. Though the bill failed in the Senate, similar efforts have succeeded in weakening free speech protections and helped lead to Khalil’s arrest. The “Free Mahmoud Khalil Now” event concluded with a speaker from Mothers for a Ceasefire, who spoke about other regions where U.S. policies have contributed to ongoing conflicts, such as Sudan, Congo, and Haiti. Circling back to Palestine, she said, “It’s only freedom of speech when they promote a genocide on a nation. However, when we tell our politicians to stop killing children, we are the problem.” Work Cited Geller, Lena. "Something You Can’t Ignore: Q&A with Hashem Amireh, Who Was Suspended Following the Pro-Palestine Protests at UNC." Indyweek , 12 June 2024, https://indyweek.com/news/orange/something-you-cant-ignore-qa-with-hashem-amireh-who-was-suspended-following-the-pro-palestine-protests-at-unc/ . Silverstein, Andrew. "McCarran-Walter Act: State Department Plan to Deport Pro-Hamas Students." Forward, 7 March 2025, https://forward.com/news/702427/mccarran-walter-act-state-department-plan-deport-pro-hamas-students/ . Lonsdorf, Kat. "Gaza Air Strike: Israel and Al-Khair Foundation." NPR , 16 Mar. 2025, https://www.npr.org/2025/03/15/nx-s1-5329257/gaza-air-strike-israel-al-khair-foundation . Foushee, Valerie. X (formerly Twitter) , 17 March 2025, https://x.com/ValerieFoushee/status/1901708531016835402 . "Prime Minister Netanyahu to AIPAC delegation of Democratic Congressmen: We must win - there is no substitute for victory." Israeli PM YouTube Channel , 27 March 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrGI_9FDGR4 .
- 150 Businesses, Groups Urge NC Governor to Rein in Fossil Fuel-Friendly Duke Energy
Fracked gas plant in NC: Image credit: Duke Energy via Creative Commons Today 150 environmental, social justice, faith and youth organizations and businesses from across the country called on North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein to confront Duke Energy Corp.’s expansion of planet-warming fossil fuels and obstruction of renewable energy solutions [ 1 ]. The letter comes after the town of Carrboro sued Duke Energy — the third-largest corporate polluter in the country — in the first-ever lawsuit against an electric utility for harms caused by the company’s decades-long climate deception campaign [ 2 ]. The town’s lawsuit says Duke Energy’s actions have worsened the climate crisis and cost the town millions of dollars. According to the complaint, Duke Energy executives have known for more than 50 years about the dangers of fossil fuels but have facilitated a nationwide campaign to mislead the public about its climate harms and increased reliance on coal and gas for electricity. Now communities across the state are being harmed as fossil fuels drive up utility bills and pollution and worsen the climate crisis. “The nation and the world desperately need bold leaders to step up as climate champions,” said Jim Warren, executive director of NC WARN. “Gov. Stein must break through the continuing Duke Energy deception and help the public understand that North Carolina cannot allow the continued expansion of fracked gas and the suppression of cheaper, faster, fairer solar power at the local level.” Stein has a history of standing up to Duke Energy leaders and other polluters during his eight years as attorney general. As governor, he should use his powerful voice to help the public understand the urgency of phasing out fossil fuels this decade, the groups say. They are urging Stein to use his broad authority to alter Duke Energy’s business practices to stop increasing fossil fuel power generation and suppressing solar power [ 3 ]. “Gov. Stein must stand up to fossil fuel bullies like Duke Energy, whose anti-climate shenanigans are causing widespread harm to people and our planet,” said Gaby Sarri-Tobar, senior energy justice campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity. “North Carolinians, like millions of people across the country, are facing life-altering fossil fuel-driven extreme weather and skyrocketing utility bills. And it’ll only get worse as Duke Energy expands fracked gas and blocks resilient and affordable renewable energy solutions like rooftop and community solar. Especially now as Trump and his billionaire buddies throw communities and our climate under the bus, we need Gov. Stein to be the first in line to challenge the polluters who are putting lives in peril.” Duke Energy plans to build 9 gigawatts of new fracked gas plants in the Carolinas alone by 2033, which would saddle families with higher utility bills, worsen air and water quality, and fuel global warming and more extreme weather, like heat waves and hurricanes, in the Southeast [ 4 ]. Meanwhile, in 2023, the corporation generated only 1.4% of its power from solar [ 5 ]. For many years, Duke Energy has obstructed local solar solutions, like rooftop and community solar, despite the many community and resilience benefits distributed renewable energy provides [ 6 ]. “Gov. Stein, as our former Attorney General, you are keenly aware of all the work we’ve done to protect our communities and minimize climate change,” said Bobby Jones, President of the Down East Coal Ash Environmental and Social Justice Coalition. “Yet our communities are still reeling from past hurricanes and heat waves. And many are still waiting on Rebuild NC to restore their homes. We are hopeful that you will help change course for North Carolina and protect the people from Duke Energy’s climate-destroying business plan.” NC WARN and the Center for Biological Diversity welcome additional signers as the campaign continues to grow. This article was first published by NC WARN . Work Cited “Concern Regarding Duke Energy’s Decades-Long Climate Deception and Urgent Need for Solutions.” NC WARN and Center for Biological Diversity . 6 Mar. 2025, www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/SteinLetter3-6-25.pdf . “Town of Carrboro v. Duke Energy.” Carrboro , 4 Dec. 2024, www.carrboronc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15749/Complaint-Litigation- . “Is Gov. Roy Cooper a Climate Change Pretender?" NC WARN , 9 Nov. 2023, www.ncwarn.org/2023/09/is-gov-roy-cooper-a-climate-change-pretender . Ouzts, Elizabeth. “Regulators OK Duke Energy'S Gas-plant Buildout Despite N.C. Climate Law.” Canary Media , 6 Nov. 2024, www.canarymedia.com/articles/utilities/regulators-ok-duke-energys-gas-plant-buildout-despite-n-c-climate-law . " Advancing Toward a Cleaner Tomorrow, Duke Energy Impact Report." Duke Energy , 2023, s201.q4cdn.com/583395453/files/doc_downloads/2024/05/impact-report-2023-final.pdf . “NC Court of Appeals Upholds Duke Energy Attack on Rooftop Solar.” NC WARN , 17 Sept. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/2024/09/nc-court-of-appeals-upholds-duke-energy-attack-on-rooftop-solar-nc-warn-news-release .
- 300-Plus Violations Lead to Amended Lick Creek Lawsuit
More than 300 previously unknown sediment and erosion control violations at the site of a housing development under construction in southeast Durham has prompted Sound Rivers to amend its federal lawsuit against the developer. The original lawsuit against Clayton Properties Group, Inc., d/b/a Mungo Homes, was filed in September of 2023 by the Southern Environmental Law Center on behalf of environmental organization Sound Rivers— an attempt to stop sediment pollution flowing from the 216-acre housing development into nearby creeks. These creeks, Martin Branch and Hurricane Creek, connect through Lick Creek into Falls Lake, a major drinking-water source for Raleigh and surrounding communities. “These issues came to light through a public records request and the discovery process,” said Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop. “In that process, we learned about these additional violations, which are all violations of the Clean Water Act.” The violations listed include sediment flowing off-site, failure to maintain required sediment and erosion control measures and failure to establish ground cover on exposed soil to prevent it from flowing off the construction site and into neighboring waterways. Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop collects a water sample from a sediment-laden tributary of Lick Creek. “These were issues identified on-site by Clayton’s own self-inspections required by their CWA permit, which requires self-inspections, regularly and after certain rainfall events,” Samantha said. “Right now, the site has so much land exposed and not adequately managed that it’s no wonder nearby creeks are suffering.” In addition to the issues reported by these self-inspections, Durham County sediment and erosion-control inspectors also issued another notice of violation to the developer in December 2024, bringing the total of county-issued NOVs for the Sweetbrier site to three. “This is a bad actor,” Samantha said. “They continue to be a bad actor and violate the law, and our water-quality sampling data continues to reflect the impacts this site is having on the tributaries of Lick Creek.” Since 2022, Samantha has been documenting sediment pollution in streams in the Lick Creek watershed. Sediment is the leading cause of water pollution in North Carolina by volume, and is a known threat to aquatic life and habitat. Developers are required to ensure construction activities do not harm water quality for downstream communities, who rely on water sources for a variety of uses including fishing, swimming, boating and drinking-water supplies. “Ultimately, our goal is to hold this repeat offender responsible by requiring them to clean up their site and pay substantial monetary civil penalties under the Clean Water Act for the damage that they’ve done,” Samantha said. Like the work Neuse Riverkeeper Samantha Krop is doing to protect Lick Creek? Donate today to support her work! This article was first published by Sound Rivers .
- Reverend Nelson Johnson Presente! We Mourn the Loss of a Movement Giant
On Sunday, February 9, our movement lost another giant when our beloved Reverend Nelson Johnson passed away at the age of 81. Based in Greensboro, Rev. Johnson dedicated his life to building a movement of Black, Brown and working class people for liberation, justice and power. His patient, long-term efforts to build our social movement have helped lay the groundwork for our efforts to build UE Local 150 and improve conditions of working class people, and build a truly people-centered democracy. While a student at NC A&T University in the late 1960s, Rev. Johnson was a leader during the 1969 student protests. In the 1960s and 70s, Johnson was a strong fighter for civil rights and Black liberation as part of the Student Organization for Black Unity and later the African Liberation Support Committee. Through this work, he met leaders and organizers that would later be part of founding UE150. In the late 1970s, Rev. Johnson was part of the Workers Viewpoint Organization. WVO and the movement organized low wage workers at Cone Mills, Duke Hospital, textile mills, and other workplaces, along with tenants in public housing in Greensboro. In retaliation for their successful organizing against racism and to build unions, on November 3, 1979, the Ku Klux Klan murdered five of his close comrades in front of news cameras but were never convicted. As a survivor of the Greensboro Massacre, Rev. Johnson organized an international campaign, which included Archbishop Desmond Tutu, for truth and reconciliation. From these efforts, Rev. Johnson went deeper into community and became a pastor, founding the Faith Community Church and the Beloved Community Center in Greensboro. BCC would become a critical hub for organizing against racism and police brutality for several decades, including hosting weekly community roundtable discussions. In the 1980s, Rev. Johnson also played a key role in founding the Pulpit Forum, a group of Black ministers that would support labor and civil rights fights for many years. One of the forum’s important fights was to organize mostly Black women at a local K-Mart. He was one of eight “clergy arrested in labor protest,” which would define the struggle of the workers at K-Mart’s Greensboro distribution center, and capture its contradictions: a labor protest, but with prayer not picket signs, and those in handcuffs were not union leaders, but the pastors of the city’s leading Black churches. It was a significant success for organized labor in the least unionized state in the nation. It resulted in the signing of union contract by a $30 billion corporation that had thwarted prior organizing attempts everywhere else in the country. Rev. Johnson founded the Southern Faith, Labor, and Community Alliance in 2006. This alliance brought together workers, unions and faith leaders from across the South to help build more unions in the region, an effort in which UE150 participated. In 2008, through this alliance, Rev. Johnson played a critical role supporting workers during the Justice at Smithfield campaign to win a union at the world’s largest pig slaughtering plant in the town of Tar Heel. Rev. Johnson also helped bridge the divisions that the bosses created between Black and Latine workers. In 2008, he helped organize the Black and Brown Unity Conference which brought together Latine workers, including farmworkers, and Black workers, including members of Black Workers for Justice, UE150 and others. Latin Kings leader Jorge Cornell attended this conference. Rev. Johnson and Cornell played a critical role in orchestrating a cease fire to stop gun violence, which upset the Greensboro police. Rev. Johnson supported Cornell’s historic bid for mayor of Greensboro. Cornell was later attacked by federal agents and sentenced on bogus RICO charges. Rev. Johnson led an effort to have President Obama commute his sentence. In 2007, as UE150 was expanding from eastern and central North Carolina to organize state mental health workers in the western part of the state, Rev. Johnson hosted the first ever statewide meeting of the UE150 Council for Department of Health in Human Services at the Beloved Community Center. This meeting launched the Mental Health Workers Bill of Rights campaign. In 2016, when UE150 was working to build the Greensboro City Workers Union, Rev. Johnson played a critical role in helping to build relationships with city council members and eventually winning union payroll deduction. It is not possible to list all the achievements and actions taken by Rev. Johnson to help build a thriving movement for social justice across North Carolina, the South, and the country. He has taught us many lessons. His legacy will live in our daily pursuits for the liberation of our labor. Long live Reverend Nelson Johnson!
- Professor Davarian Baldwin Returns to Bull City to Cheer on Duke Respect Durham Campaign
On February 21st, Professor Davarian Baldwin addressed about 90 supporters of the Duke Respect Durham campaign at SEEDS, an urban garden and kitchen classroom just east of downtown. Baldwin, the Raether Professor at Trinity College, founder of the Smart Cities Lab, and author of a 2021 book called In the Shadow of the Ivory Tower , used the event to urge Duke University to make payments in lieu of taxes (PILOT) to local government. Despite its $11.9 billion endowment, Duke is exempt from paying property taxes on most of its properties. In a recent article, The Assembly estimated that, “If Duke weren’t exempt from many property taxes, its bill would likely fall somewhere between $11 million and the $50 million the PILOT campaigners calculated”. The same article stated that the university paid around $2 million in property tax in 2024 [ 1 ]. “The top universities are not just institutions of higher learning,” Baldwin said at the event, “They’re in fact the biggest low-wage employers, the biggest landholders, the biggest health care providers, the biggest policing agents, the biggest governmental forces, in our communities.” Ivy League institutions such as Harvard, Brown, and the University of Pennsylvania make PILOTs of $10 million or more to their local governments. In 2021, the “Yale Respect New Haven” campaign pressured the university to pay $23 million per year to the town. Duke Respect Durham has hinted at an even more ambitious goal, asking on its website, “What can Durham do with $50 million a year?” Image credit: Duke Respect Durham Friday’s event was kicked off with brief remarks by Nate Baker, a member of Durham's city council. Leigh Campoamor of the Night School Bar moderated the rest of the discussion. Baker first invited Baldwin to Durham in April 2024 to discuss the concept of a PILOT campaign with a handful of activists, an event which helped lead to the formation of Duke Respect Durham [ 2 ]. The coalition's first rally was held in September 2024 at Asbury Church [ 3 ]. “Teaching and learning are the smallest things that Duke University does,” Baldwin said at SEEDS, “They will tell you that in celebration. They say, ‘We are an economic engine’ and ‘We are a driving force’. Well, if you are that, then there is a need for extra scrutiny and public oversight to what you’re doing in our lives. Then they’ll retreat and say ‘No, no, we’re just a school.’” Duke is ranked as the country’s sixth-best university by U.S. News & World Report, but despite being a world-class beacon of learning, it hasn’t managed to illuminate the schoolhouses right next door. Durham Public Schools ranks 40th among North Carolina school districts [ 4 ]. If Duke’s attitude towards a PILOT ever changes, it may consider copying the University of Pennsylvania’s $10 million annual contribution to Philadelphia City Schools [ 5 ]. This would be a fitting solution since public schools are primarily funded with local property taxes. Baldwin also connected Duke’s tax-exempt status to its undemocratic behavior in Durham’s politics, citing the university’s notorious role in derailing the Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit (DOLRT) project in 2019 [ 6 ]. After around $157 million was spent on planning the light rail, the university refused to sign a critical cooperation agreement. High officials at Duke such as Tallman Trask III and Vincent Price cited concerns about electromagnetic interference with equipment at Duke University Hospital. At the time, GoTriangle countered that about 20 other U.S. medical centers operate near rail systems without issue [ 7 ]. Baldwin expressed enthusiasm about the progress of Duke Respect Durham, noting that Duke’s defensiveness was a sign of growing pressure. “It was just an idea, but look at us now,” he said. “The university is forced to respond, even in its derision, which tells me we will win.” The PILOT campaign’s public and political support is significant but not yet overwhelming. Baker, who is strongly identified with the campaign, works with a coalition of 31 groups, including UE Local 150, the Duke Graduate Student Union, and Triangle DSA. County commissioner Nida Allam spoke at the campaign’s September 2024 kickoff event, and elected officials such as Javiera Caballero, Natalie Beyer, Michelle Burton, and DeDreana Freeman have attended its events. The People’s Alliance, while not official endorsers of Duke Respect Durham, provided snacks and refreshments for the SEEDS event. However, the campaign faces an external challenge. The Trump administration has recently threatened to defund the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which awarded Duke more than $580 million in grants in 2024 [ 8 ]. If NIH funding is significantly cut, the university and Durham could be pushed into a crisis that drowns out calls for progressive reforms. “Biotech, health sciences, software design, military weaponry,” Baldwin said, counting on his fingers, “Where is the R&D for that work done? On college campuses in their laboratories. Combine the new economy with the property tax exempt status of campus, and what do you have? You got a new-age hustle.” Many employees driving Duke’s success have unionized under the Duke Graduate Student Union (DGSU). Academic workers voted overwhelmingly, with 88 percent in favor, to join the union in August 2023. Since then, a key demand of the DGSU has been to raise annual PhD stipends to $50,000. Duke’s president Vincent Price, who earned $1.81 million in 2023, has so far rejected this demand as stubbornly as he's refused a PILOT agreement. Professor Davarian Baldwin's two trips to Durham have helped to shape and energize the Duke Respect Durham campaign. Continued pressure on Duke’s top administrators, who are protective of the university's brand, could push them to pay a fair share of property taxes. Duke Respect Durham has invited all community members to a mass meeting on Thursday, March 6th for a discussion on the coalition's next steps. Work Cited Gretzinger, Erin, et al. “What Does Duke University Owe Durham?” The Assembly NC , 6 Feb. 2025, www.theassemblync.com/education/higher-education/duke-respect-durham . “PILOT Advocate Visits Durham, Encourages Duke University to Pay Fair Share.” Durham Dispatch , 19 Sept. 2024, www.durhamdispatch.com/post/expert-on-payment-in-lieu-of-taxes-visits-durham-encourages-duke-university-to-pay-fair-share . “With Strong Backing From Labor, ‘Duke Respect Durham’ Campaign Holds Kickoff Event.” Durham Dispatch , 16 Sept. 2024, www.durhamdispatch.com/post/with-strong-backing-from-labor-duke-respect-durham-campaign-holds-kickoff-event . “Durham Public Schools.” Niche , www.niche.com/k12/d/durham-public-schools-nc . Accessed 26 Feb. 2025. Stellino, Molly. “Activists Question Whether Wealthy Universities Should Be Exempt From Property Taxes.” The Hechinger Report , 18 Dec. 2020, www.hechingerreport.org/activists-question-whether-wealthy-universities-should-be-exempt-from-property-taxes . Fausset, Richard. “Durham Dreamed of a Transit Line. Duke University All but Killed It.” The New York Times , 18 Mar. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/us/duke-durham-light-rail-chapel-hill.html . Stancill, Jane. “Thanks to Duke, Durham’s Light Rail Dream Is All but Dead.” Bloomberg , 14 Mar. 2019, www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-14/why-duke-killed-the-durham-orange-light-rail-project . Ezzone, Zac. “Trump Policy Would Pummel UNC, Duke Research Funding.” Triangle Business Journal , 10 Feb. 2025, www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2025/02/10/trump-nih-indirect-costs-duke-unc-research-funding.html .
- The Great Trading Path: History & Preservation
Image credit: Roderico Y. Díaz, Iximché Media By Coda Cavalier, 7DS Youth Director Mekuremenchen, kihoe:huk. Mima Coda, mihastik ske:se. Mima Occaneechi Saponi. My name is Coda. I am Occaneechi Saponi from Mebane, North Carolina and I am Youth Director of 7 Directions of Service , a community organization fighting to protect sacred places and phase out fossil fuels. Have you heard of The Great Trading Path ? Many have not, but if you’ve ever driven major roads between the Eno and Haw Rivers, you’ve likely travelled along it. Image credit: NC Environmental Justice Network The Great Trading Path was exactly what it sounds like. Think of an ancient highway, but even greater: a site of trade between Southeastern tribes, cultural exchange and even human burials for those who died along their journeys. The term “Great Trading Path” refers to the whole system, although there would have likely been many routes that shifted and changed throughout time. Orange County Register of Deeds Mark Chilton wrote in 2014 that the Trading Path had a well defined route from the Eno River to the Haw River [ 1 ]. West from the Eno River, it more or less followed the current route of Old NC 10, Bowden Road, and Old Hillsborough Road to the present site of the Hawfields Presbyterian Church on NC Highway 119. The Occanechi Saponi were historically in the center of the Path. It connected our ancestors not only to their villages, but to neighboring tribes such as the Catawba and other Saponi in South Carolina and Virginia. The Path was a site of vibrant humanity and exchange before colonization. My ancestors set up camp by its waterways, held ceremonies, ate and shared stories and art, and if anyone died along their journeys, they were there. Originally, my people lived on an island around Roanoke River, and then settled along the Haw and Eno Rivers around present day Alamance and Orange Counties. My ancestors in particular settled in the rural area of Alamance, and our land has been passed down (and we have had to fight for it) for at least 100 years. We are a blend of cultures. Our traditional items included carved weapons and western metal. Our regalia encompassed both leather and cloth. Image credit: Roderico Y. Díaz, Iximché Media Like our ancestors, we continue to fight to protect our unique culture and sacred sites from destruction and erasure. The Mebane City Council recently designated a section of the Great Trading Path for heavy industry, and we are now forced to watch as it is desecrated by giant warehouses and the future Buc-ee’s gas station . Back Creek is situated at the heart of this section, and had provided clean water and a resting place for travelers. Construction alongside the creek has already caused severe sedimentation and runoff, destroying water quality and harming threatened species. Image credit: Roderico Y. Díaz, Iximché Media On January 15, 2025, the World Monuments Watch, a global initiative to preserve endangered heritage sites, announced that the Great Trading Path had been selected as one of its sites of the year, a status that honors the legacy of the Path and will bring greater visibility to the Indigenous histories that defined the Southeastern United States. Check out the Great Trading Path’s WMW page here . Indigenous community members have also been campaigning to demand that the city of Mebane take steps to formally consult and include our communities in land-use and city planning, and to recognize our historical and cultural contributions in meaningful ways. You can sign our petition here . We are living at a time when Indigenous peoples are uniting across Turtle Island to defend our histories and all that is sacred. Our ancestors laid the groundwork for our resilience, and we will always pick ourselves up and continue fighting. Resources The Great Trading Path on World Monuments Watch . Learn more about the 7DS fight to protect the Great Trading Path . Sign and share our petition to the City of Mebane: Respect Native Voices . This article was first published by 7 Directions of Service . Work Cited Chilton, Mark. “Tracing the Trading Path.” OrangePolitics , 24 Feb. 2014, https://orangepolitics.org/2014/02/tracing-the-trading-path .
- Interview With CAUSE Leader Rev. Ryan Brown on Amazon Workers Unionizing in Garner, NC
By Carl Hintz After a successful union card signing campaign, Carolina Amazonians United for Solidarity and Empowerment (CAUSE) has secured a NLRB election. On February 10th through February 15th, thousands of Amazon workers at the RDU1 warehouse in Garner, NC will vote on whether to unionize with CAUSE. Amazon has illegally fired some workers for organizing, including the former VP of CAUSE and the current President of CAUSE, and even some workers for simply saying that they plan to vote yes to unionize. Amazon has subjected workers to captive anti-union meetings, attempted to divide the workplace with identity politics, and even had three organizers arrested who were providing free food, but workers at RDU1 remain steadfast. Rev. Ryan Brown is a pastor, co-founder and current president of CAUSE, who was wrongfully fired by Amazon in retaliation for his organizing efforts. To stand in solidarity with the Amazon workers at RDU1, go to amazoncause.com/volunteer-with-us/ and attend CAUSE Community Committee meetings and events. Three years of organizing at RDU1 Answer from Rev. Ryan Brown: The idea for the organizing came to me when I was sent to a part of the warehouse that was a Covid hotspot. In January 2022, I approached Ms. Mary [co-founder of CAUSE] about organizing the warehouse, so we’ve been organizing for three years. A lot of our leaders have developed through one-on-one [organizing conversations]. Some were just natural leaders. Others didn’t realize certain gifts that they had so I’ve watched more people than I can remember develop as leaders right in front of me. Why workers are joining the union People join workplace unions for various reasons—for working conditions, for pay, for more time off. People want to be recognized for their humanity, and not seen as replaceable robots. Workers want to live with dignity and respect and be treated with dignity and respect on the job. Amazon’s disregard for worker safety If you are injured on the job, you have to jump through all of these hoops to get accommodations approved by Amazon. If they keep denying, you have to go back to your doctor. I’ve seen folks return with a letter in hand and be forced to work against [the doctor’s order] and be injured that same day. One of our demands is a one-hour paid lunch break. Everything is speed speed, speed, speed. Even the lunch period, the two 30-minute breaks are not really thirty minutes—all you’re doing is just walking and walking and you may just have ten to fifteen minutes to sit down. If you don’t get back to your station on time, you will be written up. They’ve started exploiting workers another way. Workers that were hired for one department, and now forced to go to departments that don’t feel comfortable or safe. I saw a grown man come down crying from upstairs, from picking, and looking at him, you know he can’t perform the duties upstairs. He’s overweight, out of shape, and he has health chal lenges, and they sent him up there. [Amazon says] “we don’t want the union here because we want to have a direct relationship with you”—so if we have a direct relationship and I’m telling you that my body is in pain, why would you send me back to the same place of pain and failure? We’re starting to see more and more folks bringing weapons into the buildings. Amazon is such a shitty place to work for, who can say that one day you’re not going to tee off the wrong person. They don’t check us coming in, but they check us going out. You talk about safety and security, that whole process is almost like it’s criminal. Amazon’s poverty wages If you start working at Amazon, you start off at $18.50. In three years, as you do the wage step, you will end up at $20.90 and then after that you’re at the mercy of the company if they decide they want to give you a raise. There’s a lot of wealth [at the top] that comes from cheap labor. One of the things that I’ve been trying to educate and preach to, is folks do you see what’s going on? Have you ever heard of the Gilded Age? We’re living in a gilded age 2.0. I honestly went to Amazon for a career. That just ain’t happening. What was very disappointing, when the pandemic hit, Amazon treated us so great. They gave us a two or three dollar pay increase, and double overtime. Unlimited paid time off if you don’t feel good, or if you got a loved one who’s not doing well, just leave, and just report it to us. And in two months, [Jeff Bezos] rolled back all those benefits and became the very first human being to make more than $200 billion. Fighting for language justice At one time there was not even language justice. [Amazon] would put everything in English, and you had a large influx of workers who only spoke Spanish. And when policies were broken, and they didn’t get the memo, [Amazon] would discipline them. Workers have a voice in the union There’s been a lot of times where I, personally, felt there was a wrong vote, but I committed to “hey, this is a democratic process.” But that’s the beauty of CAUSE and a true 100% democratic process, because as we recruit people to join CAUSE and as people get involved, they realize that they actually have a voice. When they go to those captive audience meetings and [Amazon’s] saying that “Oh, the union’s going to decide this and that for you.” No, [workers] realize how the process [of our union] actually works. CAUSE is like family, Amazon is not I think you have to understand Ms. Mary and I, who were the founders of CAUSE and started all of this, we’ve always been organizers in our community. With my expertise with serving as a pastor for so many years and with the black church, with Ms. Mary’s community activities that she does, we tap into the best of our tradition. A part of that tradition, in the black community specifically, is that black people are very loving people. We love everybody. Everybody don’t always love us back. But we love everybody. We have built a culture where we are a family. We’re a family that works together. If a family member is hurting, they’re in pain, we are there for that family member. A lot of the meetings that we have had, those meetings are in our very homes because we want you to feel our souls and the love that we have that’s expressed in our home and in our food and that’s why we call it soul food. We love all people. Ms. Mary used to be a truck driver, I used to do a lot of missionary work around the world and all over the United States. We’ve met a lot of our coworkers in our past experiences on every single level. We were able to connect with people, we were able to recruit them to CAUSE and the structure of being just one big family. In this family, it don’t matter the color of your skin. It don’t matter what your pronouns are, it don’t matter if you’re religious, spiritual or atheist. We’re all a part of the human family. So our rank and file is very diverse. We’re the experts of our own workplace I don’t believe that there is one size that fits all when it comes to organizing Amazon. Every region, every demographic, has its own culture. Our building is majority Black and Hispanic. People of color, and oppressed people, any time that systems have not worked for us that were supposed to work for us and protect us, we’ve always gone outside of those systems, and built our own systems. That’s just organically how CAUSE evolved. When we set out to organize, we didn’t really know anything about unions and organizing workers. But we just organically evolved, and said, hey it’s best that we do this by ourselves because we’re the experts of our own workplace. A community effort One of the ways that the broader community can help is to join or listen in to one of our community committee meetings and start having discussions. We have a community committee, and it’s led strictly by the community. Amazon has gotten so large that at least one of us knows somebody who is a delivery driver or works in one of their warehouses. Ask those people, really, is it as bad as people say that it is? No man is an island unto himself. A lot of how Amazon comes into our communities, you may not be feeling the effects now. But it’s an essential threat to all of us, even with how they mistreat the environment. All of us at this point should have a vested interest in [resisting] this monster, this evil system.
- Duke University Deploys “Pickets, Protests, and Demonstrations” Policy to Silence Dissent
Image credit: Artists Against Apartheid Duke University has escalated its repression against pro-Palestine, anti-genocide protest. Seven members of the Duke community, students and faculty, will be called before the University Judicial Board for hearings that decide whether there will be punishments for nonviolent vocal protest on West Campus on the evening of November 19, 2024. Potential consequences for students range from suspensions to expulsions, among others. For faculty, the hearings determine whether or not they will be fired. [1] In a November 21, 2024 email sent to the entire Duke community, the Provost promised that a nameless group of administrators would conduct a nonspecific “investigation” of the protest, which included about 50 people outside and inside the Social Sciences Building, against former Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, who “spent much of his career in the Israeli Defense Forces Legal System and also served as Chief Military Advocate General.” [2] The event, billed as “ A Conversation ,” was sponsored by the soft-money Program in American Grand Strategy at Duke as well as the Duke Provost Office and the Duke Center for Jewish Studies. Protesters inside and outside provided a counter-narrative to this longtime representative of a country committing an unadulterated live-streamed genocide. [3] Prior to the 2024-25 school year, Duke joined countless university administrations panicking against rising student protests and encampments across the US in a coordinated effort to shut down anti-genocide protests, and dissent against university complicity/support for genocide, as universities worked with the same legal and ideological advisors. [4] The result at Duke, a new “ Pickets, Protests, and Demonstrations ” policy and committee, bans protests the university does not authorize and threatens people with disciplinary and legal action for participating in or attending such protests. The PPD policy is ambiguously worded, internally contradictory, and even in direct conflict with other university policies, such as those in the Faculty Handbook. [5] Moreover, its application to the November 19 protest is opaque. Out of approximately 50 Duke community members who gathered, on what basis were seven people chosen? It appears that the Duke administration wants to make an example of select community members in order to intimidate and silence all organized dissent against the genocide. This follows over a year of Duke administrative repression, threats, and instructions to delimit questions and stifle speech advocating for Palestinian liberation from Israeli siege, genocide, and settler-colonialism backed by US military, financial, and moral support. These acts at Duke occurred largely behind closed doors but were directly experienced and documented by tens of students, faculty, and staff across university divisions. PPD purportedly balances “academic freedom” with “order.” But when one reads the policy, this farcical distinction quickly breaks down. For instance, the university separates “noise” from “speech,” and yet, the provost committee says it can apply the policy against people for giving speeches. Duke claims it does not repress speech based on an ideological litmus test yet requires all gatherings to be approved, which is absurd on its face. Historically, unsanctioned protests and actions at Duke have advanced racial equality, created living wages for workers, and ended Duke’s investments in apartheid South Africa. [6] Duke acknowledges that past protests have eliminated injustices, yet insists our community must now either ask for their permission or face life-altering disciplinary consequences. Duke’s “shared values” are “respect, trust, inclusion, discovery and excellence.” The PPD claims to maintain these values. But we insist it matters what we are being asked to respect, which powers we are being asked to trust, and which voices are included. What has Duke allowed us to “discover” when the vaunted Law School has not held any public events on the International Criminal Court or International Court of Justice hearings and decisions with regard to Israel? Or when the Nicholas School of the Environment cancels student group events on the environmental impact of war and genocide? Or when the upper echelons demand obsequiousness to the Israeli-Duke line from faculty and staff in airless meeting rooms and on Zoom? There is no “excellence” in rewarding with massive honoraria those who deny, are complicit in, and profit from genocide. Rather than offering room for “dialogue,” the PPD’s biased deployment demonstrates Duke has already picked a side. Such intellectual dishonesty is unbecoming of a world-class university. In practical terms, the PPD is a dangerous policy that will likely be applied to any form of protest that does not fall within its definition of “order”– anything that uncomfortably challenges university priorities. Are we as a university community that fragile? We demand dissolution of this corrupt policy, and that all disciplinary hearings against our community members be cancelled. This article was first published by Duke Academics and Staff for Justice in Palestine . Work Cited https://dukecommunitystandard.students.duke.edu/appendices/appendix-judicial-system-duke-university/ Mandelblit is known for facilitating illegal settlements , refusal to investigate torture (resulting in death), and flagrant disrespect of the International Criminal Court . Despite widespread consensus among major human rigths organizations that Israel regularly violates international law (see footnote 2), Mandelblit has made the preposterous claim that “Israel does not commit atrocities.” Several human rights organizations have deemed this siege genocide. They include Al Haq , Euro Med Monitor , Amnesty International , Human Rights Watch , and Doctors Without Borders . A non-exhaustive list of universities with nearly identical policies can be found here . The AAUP released a statement condemning these policies as an assault on academic freedom and faculty governance (see also an earlier statement on peaceful protest here ). Legal experts say that these policies are in direct conflict with free speech . See also the UN Special Report condemning university repression policies. The full statement from the UN is here . See Appendix D on academic freedom, versus Appendix I on PPD in the Faculty Handbook, which are in conflict. Oddly, faculty magically turn into students (i.e., under the authority of Student Affairs) when they protest. For more information on the history of student protest at Duke, see the university’s extensive archival collection .
- UNC Graduate Workers Hold Rally With Message for Chancellor Roberts: "Pay Us a Living Wage!"
Graduate workers at the UNC-Chapel Hill, who are critical to the university’s teaching and research mission, and whose pay does not cover basic necessities , held a rally on Friday, January 31st to demand an increase to the PhD stipend to a minimum of $40,000 per academic year and periodic “meet and confer” sessions between UNC-Chapel Hill administrators and worker representatives through The Workers Union at UNC [ 1 ]. The Workers Union at UNC, which is affiliated with UE Local 150, gathered 2,000 signatures for a petition requesting that the university increase graduate stipends and delivered the petition electronically to Chancellor Lee Roberts. They received no response from him or his office, so they held a rally to restate their demands and re-delivered the petition to his office in person. “Every year I teach two 40-student classes,” said Jorge Mancilla, a graduate instructor and UE 150 member. “Each one of my students pays over $2,500 to be in my class. You can do the math. How is it possible that my classes generate over $100,000 in revenue for the university, and I can’t afford to pay my rent or buy groceries? They are flat out stealing from us pretending they don’t have the money, but they do have it because they make it from us. We won’t take this anymore.” “Most of us here took a pay cut to come to UNC, but we did it because we are committed to teaching and research,” said Simone Sparks, another graduate instructor and UE 150 member. “And now, when we are asking to get paid just enough to afford basic necessities, the administration insults us by telling us we should be grateful to be here. No, they are the ones who should be grateful we are still showing up to work. Most people would not work under these conditions.” The graduate workers' demands stem from years of low pay and constant overwork [ 2 ]. According to UNC’s website, the minimum PhD stipend is $20,000 for a full academic year. The MIT Living Wage Calculator estimates that the annual cost of basic necessities in Orange County is around $51,000 [ 3 ]. Graduate workers are demanding $40,000 a year, which would be closer to stipends paid by comparable universities. Currently, the minimum PhD stipend at UNC is lower than the minimum stipend offered by other UNC considers “peer institutions”, such as Duke University ($40,000), the University of Texas ($32,000) and the University of California-Berkeley ($40,000) [ 4 , 5 ]. UNC not only forces workers to undergo economic hardship in exchange for obtaining their degree, it also jeopardizes its ability to attract the talent needed to maintain its stature among the country’s top universities. Robert Ward, a graduate instructor and member of UE 150 said, “Poverty interferes with our research work, affects the quality of our teaching and increases the time it takes for us to finish our dissertation. If the UNC administration is serious about maintaining the quality of the university and preventing decline, they will pay us a living stipend now. This is the time to act.” Graduate workers will continue fighting for their demands along with The Workers Union at UNC. We hope to hold the university accountable for taking graduate workers for granted for too long. Work Cited Herrera, Caleb. “‘Undervaluing Research and Education’: Grad Students Want Stipend Increase.” The Daily Tar Heel , 19 Jan. 2025, www.dailytarheel.com/article/2025/01/university-graduate-student-stipends . Kern, Jillian. “A History of UNC Graduate Stipends.” ArcGIS StoryMaps , 29 Dec. 2022, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3ca1a8705ac64093bcbdb622b7784892 . "Orange County, North Carolina." MIT Living Wage Calculator, https://livingwage.mit.edu/counties/37135 . “Graduate Worker Stipend State of Emergency at UNC Chapel Hill.” Triangle Blog Blog , 11 Nov. 2024, https://triangleblogblog.com/2024/11/11/graduate-worker-stipend-state-of-emergency-at-unc-chapel-hill . "UNC System-Defined Peer Group." UNC System Office and OIRA. 10 May 2018, https://oira.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/297/2018/05/UNC-System-Defined-Peer-Group_20180522.pdf .
- Gov. Cooper Greenwashes Duke Energy Before Leaving Office
In an interview in his final days as Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper repeated the pretense that North Carolina is transitioning to clean energy [ 1 ]. Gov. Cooper said he regrets that Duke Energy leaders are planning to add “a little more gas” than “necessary” to burn for power generation, and he boasted of the solar that might be added (many years from now). As NC WARN has explained many times to reporters, the comparison is smoke and mirrors. Duke’s latest (pro) carbon plan proposes nearly nine gigawatts (GW) of new gas-fired generation capacity by 2033, the equivalent of some 10 Shearon Harris nuclear plants [ 2, pg. 37 ]. Most of those gas units would generate power around 75 percent of the time. By contrast, Duke plans roughly nine GW of new solar field capacity by 2033. But solar generates power around 20 percent of the time. Thus, the actual electricity to be generated from new gas dwarfs the amount from new solar. And Duke is expanding the gas-fired generation right now, while limiting additions of large solar for years to come. In addition, the utility has deeply hampered rooftop and parking lot solar-plus-storage – the fastest, cheapest, fairest tool we have to phase out fossil fuels [ 3 ]. Combined cycle (CC) and combustion turbine (CT) are compatible with fracked gas. Image credit: Duke Energy, “Supplemental Planning Analysis” In fact, Duke Energy in the Carolinas is planning the largest gas buildout of any utility in the nation – a head-on collision with the demands of climate scientists [ 4 , 5 ] Gov. Cooper wants to be our US senator, and he can be lauded for many things. But holding Duke Energy accountable isn’t among them. This type of greenwashing is similar to that cited in Carrboro’s new lawsuit against Duke Energy for its 50-year conspiracy to deceive everyone about the corporation’s role in causing and responding to the global climate crisis. Scientists are demanding the phase out of fossil fuels right now, not some scheme to claim “carbon neutrality” decades down the line, which is nothing but a losing strategy. Politicians and others must stop enabling Duke Energy to pretend North Carolina is on the right track toward helping avert runaway climate crisis. This article was published first by NC WARN . Work Cited Wagner, Adam. “After 2 Terms as Governor, Cooper Looks Back at How NC Became ‘A Clean Energy Epicenter.’” News and Observer , 26 Dec. 2024, www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article297400916.html . “Supplemental Planning Analysis.” Duke Energy , 2024, www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/our-company/carolinas-resource-plan/supplements/supplemental-planning-analysis.pdf?rev=f134d62ba6d645ccb3de2bc227a0d42d . Heilman, Sara. “Duke Energy on Defense at NC Court of Appeals Over Regulators’ Agreement to Slash Solar Incentives.” NC WARN , 13 Feb. 2024, www.ncwarn.org/2024/02/duke-energy-on-defense-at-nc-court-of-appeals-over-regulators-agreement-to-slash-solar-incentives-news-release-from-nc-warn-ewg . “Say NO to Duke and Dominion’s Dirty, Dangerous Fracked Gas Buildout.” Sierra Club , 2024, www.sierraclub.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/2719%20NC-Factsheet%2005_web%20%281%29.pdf . Robertson, Sally. “Top Climate Expert Leads 45 Scientists Calling for Gov. Roy Cooper, CEO Lynn Good to Stop Duke Energy’s Huge Fossil Fuel Expansion.” NC WARN , 15 Nov. 2022, www.ncwarn.org/2022/11/scientist-letter-to-cooper-and-good-to-stop-duke-gas .
- “We Fight Back”: Triangle Left Holds Rally on MLK Day in Moore Square
On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, more than thirty progressive organizations held a rally and march Moore Square. Around two hundred people gathered at the “We Fight Back” event to condemn President Trump’s vow to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. War, worker rights, and a warming world were also main themes the Sunday event. Groups set up tables on the side of Moore Square closest to Hargett Street. The booth nearest to the entrance signed up volunteers for CAUSE, a nascent union at the RDU1 Amazon warehouse in Garner. Workers at the facility have asked for community support as they prepare for an NLRB election in mid-February [ 1 ]. Less than three percent of North Carolina workers are unionized, which is quite low even by US standards. Victor Urquiza, a member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), was the first speaker. He said, “We understand that Gaza has become a moral authority for people of conscience across the world. The right to resist cannot be revoked. The true definition of Palestinian liberation is now cemented in the consciousness of millions of people across the world.” Fundraisers for Gaza relief, anti-genocide placards, and numerous keffiyehs at the "We Fight Back" rally were reminders that Palestine has become a core issue for many activists. Dozens of ceasefire rallies and marches have been held in Moore Square since October 2023. The Raleigh protests were a major part of the most immediate, sustained movement against a US-backed war in North Carolina history. The second speaker at Sunday’s event, Brea Perry of Refund Raleigh, addressed the legacy of MLK. She said, “We dare not forget that King was abandoned by many people, black and white, the moment he started talking about a radical redistribution of political and economic power and spoke out against the Vietnam War. We dare not forget that King was assassinated the day after he stood with 1,300 striking sanitation workers in Memphis, Tennessee.” MLK gave the speech called “A Time to Break the Silence” against the Vietnam War in 1967. The New York Times dubbed the speech “Dr. King’s Error” and slapped King on the wrist for “whitewashing Hanoi” and “recklessly comparing American military methods to those of the Nazis”. Instead of promoting anti-war sentiment, the Times suggested, MLK needed to focus on fixing the “slum mores and habits” that cause American poverty [ 2 ]. After the US invasion of South Vietnam in 1962, it took seven years for substantial protest to develop in North Carolina. By that time, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese people had been killed. When opposition materialized in 1969 and 1970 the demonstrations centered on UNC-Chapel Hill, NC State, and Duke [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. El Pueblo, a Latino advocacy organization, provided two speakers for the “We Fight Back” rally. Mario Alfaro said, “Immigrants have been turned into a kind of public enemy responsible for all domestic problems. The damage from this is enormous and should concern us all.” A second speaker from El Pueblo, Florence Simán, continued, “We as immigrants are singled out and persecuted for being different, either because of our origin, skin color, ethnicity, language, religions… or simply for exercising our individual freedoms.” A large Mexican flag waved over the center of the crowd throughout Sunday's event. Attendees held signs that read, “Defend Immigrant Families”, “No Mass Deportations”, “Gaza to Mexico No to Border Walls”, and “Wall Street Is the Enemy, Not Immigrants”. El Pueblo's advocates ended their speeches with a call for government to serve the entire population, not a narrow sector of corporations and top politicians. Since the 1970s, US elites have favored policies that have increased inequality, destabilized the economy, and weakened unions. The policies have harmed and infuriated wide swathes of the population and many are looking for culprits to blame. With some success, President Trump has directed blame away from billionaires and toward scapegoats such as undocumented immigrants who he says “rape, pillage, thieve, plunder and kill” [ 6 ]. Many of the undocumented immigrants in North Carolina, far from being violent themselves, are fleeing the hideous violence of US foreign policy. Take a look at Guatemala, which is a leading source of undocumented people in North Carolina [ 7 ]. In 1952, the Eisenhower administration overthrew the popular, progressive Arbenz government of that country. For the next half-century, hundreds of thousands of Guatemalans were massacred by US-backed military dictatorships. As a result, people fled the devastated country. Another main source of North Carolina’s undocumented population is El Salvador, where the US role has been equally brutal. Other speakers at the Sunday’s event included Artivista Karlin of Sunrise Durham and Saige Smith from Triangle Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The Palestinian Youth Movement and Mothers for Ceasefire also sent speakers. The representative from Mothers for Ceasefire read a deeply moving note from a young man living in Gaza: Life in Gaza is bleak, dark, and depressing. And sad because we cannot do anything. Every year a war breaks out, sometimes two wars in one year, destroying everything and stealing more of our friends, loved ones, and everything we built. Since my childhood I have lived a tough life, working in markets to provide money and food for my family. Despite the hardships, God blessed me with a beautiful voice, a big heart, and immense patience. Because of this, I always try to bring happiness to people and put smiles on their faces because we deserve life, safety, and happiness despite this dark reality. The most recent war began on October 7th. I’ll never forget that day as it brought unbearable hardships, but I am still alive, and because of your support I am deeply grateful. During this war, the occupation bombed my family’s home while we were inside. The house was sheltering 118 people. Children, women, men, and elders. None of us belong to any political party or organization. We were all civilians. Despite this, the occupation killed more than half of my family. Over 70 people were killed, including my uncles, their children, their wives, my grandmother, my aunts, their husbands, and their children. Even my cat. Only 48 of us survived the bombing. Is this because we were innocent? Is this justice? Work Cited Gordon, Brian. “Amazon Warehouse Workers in Garner to Decide on Union in Election Next Month.” News and Observer , 9 Jan. 2025, www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article298151058.html . “Dr. King’s Error.” New York Times , 7 Apr. 1967, https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1967/04/07/90316200.html?pageNumber=36 . “Vietnam War Protests.” UNC Libraries . www.exhibits.lib.unc.edu/exhibits/show/protest/vietnam-essay . “Activists and Authorities: The May 1970 Protests”. History Department of North Carolina State University, www.soh.omeka.chass.ncsu.edu/1970-home . Curtis, Miranda. “Anti-Vietnam War Protests”. Durham Civil and Human Rights Map, www.durhamcivilrightsmap.org/places/5-anti-vietnam-war-protest . Reid, Tim. “Trump Escalates Harsh Rhetoric Against Immigrants, Harris.” Reuters , 29 Sept. 2024, www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-escalates-dark-rhetoric-against-immigrants-harris-2024-09-28 . “Profile of the Unauthorized Population: North Carolina.” Migration Policy Institute , 2019, www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant-population/state/NC .